Human Social Isolation and Stress: A Systematic Review of Different Contexts and Recommendations for Future Studies.

OBJECTIVES: The emergence of COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent lockdowns and social distancing measures adopted worldwide raised questions about the possible health effects of human social isolation. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review on PubMed, Scopus and Embase electronic databases using terms related to human social isolation - defined as the isolation of an individual from regular routines and usual social contact - and psychological stress, searching for simulated or naturalistic isolation environments. We present the main results, as well as the validity and limitations of each model. PROSPERO registry number: CRD42021241880. RESULTS: Despite the diversity of contexts reviewed, some outcomes almost ubiquitously relate to psychological stress, i.e. longer periods, expectation of a longer period, confinement, lack of social interaction and support. Based on the results, considering that most studies were not designed for the purpose of understanding isolation itself, we propose a group of recommendations for future experimental or naturalistic research on the topic. CONCLUSION: Evidence on the impact of different situations in which individuals are subjected to social isolation can assist in the development of directed preventive strategies to support people under similar circumstances. Such strategies might increase the compliance of the general public to social distancing as a non-pharmacological intervention for emerging infectious diseases.

Effective recommendations towards healthy routines to preserve mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the adherence to a set of evidence-based recommendations to support mental health during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and its association with depressive and anxiety symptoms. METHODS: A team of health workers and researchers prepared the recommendations, formatted into three volumes (1: COVID-19 prevention; 2: Healthy habits; 3: Biological clock and sleep). Participants were randomized to receive only Volume 1 (control), Volumes 1 and 2, Volumes 1 and 3, or all volumes. We used a convenience sample of Portuguese-speaking participants over age 18 years. An online survey consisting of sociodemographic and behavioral questionnaires and mental health instruments (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9] and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 [GAD-7]) was administered. At 14 and 28 days later, participants were invited to complete follow-up surveys, which also included questions regarding adherence to the recommendations. A total of 409 participants completed the study - mostly young adult women holding university degrees. RESULTS: The set of recommendations contained in Volumes 2 and 3 was effective in protecting mental health, as suggested by significant associations of adherence with PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores (reflecting anxiety and depression symptoms, respectively). CONCLUSION: The recommendations developed in this study could be useful to prevent negative mental health effects in the context of the pandemic and beyond.